Animal Use in Science: Exploring the 3Rs

Module 7

Cosmetic Product Testing on Animals

Competency: Examine the historical, regulatory, and legal trends of cosmetic product testing on animals

Learning Objectives:

  • Describe how and what animals have traditionally been used in cosmetic testing
  • Identify alternatives to testing cosmetics on animals
  • List common symbols and phrases that indicate products are not tested on animals
  • Identify key legislative elements related to animal testing in the US
  • Compare animal testing laws in the European Union and the US
  • Identify regulatory bodies that oversee cosmetic testing in the US

Assessment Option 1: Cruelty Free Consumers Research Activity

  • Identify two cosmetic or household products that you use
  • List marketing phrases or images used to note that a product is cruelty free (if applicable)
  • Research each product to determine if it is tested on animals
  • Describe the animal testing typically used on this type of product
  • Find a similar product that is the opposite of your “tested on animals” result
  • Compare the cost and consumer ratings of your product vs a similar product that is/is not tested on animals
  • Share your thoughts on using a product option that is not tested on animals
  • Present your findings in a chart, digital presentation, outline, or written summary

Assessment Option 2: Written Argument: Letter to a Congressional Representative

  • Identify your position for or against the passage of the Humane Cosmetics Act
  • Support your position with at least three specific points regarding the impact of the act
  • Identify how passage of this act would impact humans
  • Identify how passage of this act would impact animals
  • Identify how passage of this act applies the 3Rs
Download Materials

Lesson plan, worksheets, and activities (PDF, 601 KB)

Presentations:

The Draize Test
(PowerPoint, 4.4 MB)

Advocacy, Policy Change, and Scientific Advancement in the Cosmetic Industry
(PowerPoint, 11.0 MB)

Cruelty Free Cosmetics
(PowerPoint, 8.2 MB)

Linked External Standards:

NGSS

HS-ETS1-3 Evaluate a solution to a complex real-world problem based on prioritized criteria and trade-offs that account for a range of constraints, including cost, safety, reliability, and aesthetics as well as possible social, cultural, and environmental impacts

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.9-10.1

Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.